
OVERDRAFT PRIVILEGE: SERVICE OR BURDEN?
By John M. Floyd
An interesting debate is emerging in the national media, which questions whether banks,
thrifts and credit unions are beneficent saints or gold-digging sinners in offering their
account holders and members check overdraft programs. Consumer groups and some journalists
are even calling for regulatory investigation and intervention.
("Some Banks Encourage Overdrafts, Reaping Profit," New York Times, Jan. 22, 2003.)
From my 30-year perspective as both a banker and a consultant to financial institutions and
financial services firms in the United States and Central America, overdraft issues are neither
all black nor all white. They are certainly about avoiding red, however, as in "red ink," both by
customers and bankers.
Overdraft privilege programs cover checks written by account
holders or members of financial institutions - checks that would
otherwise bounce due to non-sufficient funds (NSF). This privilege
often extends to customers' ATM accounts and debit cards. This service
is actually structured for institutions to allow its account holders to
overdraw their transaction accounts, subject to pre-established limits.
The overdrawn account must return to a positive balance every 30 days.
More than 1,500 U.S. financial institutions out of an estimated 18,000
in this country offer such programs. More of them are commissioning
Efficiency & Income Studies and Sales & Service Implementation
Programs to evaluate customer perceptions, potential profitability and
marketing strategies. With a soft economy persisting and lending
activity off sharply, bankers are looking to non-interest income to
strengthen their bottom lines. Overdrafts are, indeed, among consumer
fees that bolster profitability. Most bankers offering overdraft see
the programs as an absolute win-win situation for merchants,
institutions, and their customers. An Indiana community banker, for
whom my firm assisted with a program three years ago, makes a good case
for accountholders acceptance of the program:
"Our customers have been very pleased with our (Overdraft) program. In
fact, we occasionally get thank you notes from them. They really
appreciate the fact that their (NSF) check doesn't get returned to a
retailer they frequent, embarrassing them and putting them on a `bad
check' list. They feel it saves their reputation. It also means they
don't pay a hefty fee to that retailer."
Ironically, it is typically not low-income account holders who use
overdraft, but rather moderate-income earners, who tend to live from
paycheck to paycheck. Customers with Overdraft enjoy multiple benefits.
They simply pay the financial institution one fee per NSF-paid check,
rather than the one or two fees to the financial institutions as well
as "bad check charges" to the retailer. Simple math says $25 is better
than $75 or more in charges. Discreet customer service support avoids
the humiliation of "making good" on a check with a valued retailer, and
avoids the lost time and productivity of both the customer and retailer
in "straightening out an NSF mess" . . . or answering to law
enforcement! Additionally, free checking is often offered in
conjunction with ODP plans.
A leading Florida credit union executive noted, "Our members have
enjoyed the convenience of having access to overdraft funds for
emergency purposes, before payroll deposits are available, or to pay
bills to avoid late charges and negative credit history."
Fact is, many Americans fall short at the end of the month. Many do
not have the desire or time to pursue a line of credit, nor would they
qualify. As they struggle to pay bills or to save anything at all, they
need a financial institution that understands how they live their lives
and provides a valid safety net with such programs. Some banks even
view overdraft programs as a way to "rehabilitate" customers who have
consistently bounced checks in the past.
A Central Texas banker with an ODP program for the past five years,
wrote: "We shifted into a bit of credit-counseling mode, helping our
customers understand the new process and how to better manage their
accounts. I would guess nine out of 10 customers have said they
appreciate ODP's benefits."
One Kentucky banker conceded that charge-offs for bad accounts had increased, but were acceptable in relation to the new
income from the service), and that account turnover had actually slowed because the service had solidified the bank's
relationship with its customers.
Questionable ODP Practices Demand Industry and Fed Attention
Financial institutions have been paying accountholder overdrafts since
the beginning of banking. Smart financial institutions do not promote
poor fiscal responsibility. Call an overdraft charge a fee or a
penalty, an "insurance policy" or a punitive "wake-up call," if you
must. But the fact that a population segment finds it less onerous than
returned checks, lines of credit and blemished credit records, does not
make it inherently bad.
Nevertheless, financial institutions must responsibly deploy such
programs, educating and frequently reminding customers of the terms and
use of overdraft privilege, while avoiding messages that essentially
encourage customers with low balances to overdraw their checking
accounts.
A few institutions, some due to a lack of technology, make it a
practice of including the overdraft limit in the customer's available
account balance, without informing them. The customer inadvertently
writes a check and triggers one or more charges. More customer
education would be helpful.
Historically, financial institutions have provided selective
overdraft payment for their "preferred" account holders at the
institutions discretion. Such institutions describe these relationships
as "informal," but most institutions do it consistently for the same
accounts - without noisy external promotion. Often there is no regard
to the NSF item amount., and no NSF or overdraft fees are assessed.
Some overdraft providers deliver a discriminatory form of the service
described above, marketing them as "premium" or "platinum" services,
while excluding the average account holders from participation. Since
account eligibility is not published in the above scenario, and
exclusion occurs in the premium programs, both are correctly
characterized as preferential and both are blatantly discriminatory. On
its face, that is a partisan standard.
Stable account holders who occasionally run short between
paychecks are assessed NSF fees, pay a penalty at the merchant and are
still responsible for uncleared items. The financial institutions
employing such policies unfairly disenfranchise these persons. In
effect, they chastise the "deadbeat" for poor financial management,
while "premium" customers enjoy much better treatment.
A carefully instituted ODP service, never forced on customers, avoids
many of the ills of spottily applied NSF programs and policies, while
conveying the previously outlined benefits. While there may have to be
some distinct categories of exclusion such as dormant accounts, minor
accounts and savings or money market accounts - there should be no
wholesale "redlining."
Our firm's Overdraft Privilege programs - implemented by about 400
institutions in the past 15 years -- meet all Federal Reserve System
requirements and even suggested changes. Adoption of well-managed
programs universally will bolster bottom lines in the banking industry
and benefit a wide range of consumers, as well as merchants.
Conclusion
The advantages and shortcomings of some overdraft programs warrant
national discussion and better consumer education. Financial executives
need to proceed cautiously. Customers need to use overdraft wisely, not
habitually. Steps must be taken to prevent practices that might keep an
otherwise beneficial and legitimate service from maximizing its value
to all affected.
John M. Floyd is CEO of John M. Floyd & Associates of Houston,
a profitability consulting firm to more than 1,400 financial
institutions in the past 26 years and a recognized leader for its
Overdraft Privilege programs. He welcomes comments or contact at
800-809-2307 or by e-mail through the Web site,
www.overdraftprivilege.com
Filed April 2003 |